Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Do you create top-notch media relations campaigns?

Too often, great ideas go by the wayside due to minimal media coverage.

Reporters are bombarded by a slew of story ideas every day and will cover very few—if any—of the pitches that hit their desk.

However, your creative approach put you on their radar, resulting in outstanding media coverage and unbelievable business results.

You deserve to be recognized for your unbelievable success. The launch of the 2018 Media Relations Awards allows us to showcase your talent and reward you for your amazing results.

The Media Relations Awards honors communicators who’ve built meaningful relationships with journalists and developed a unique approach to gaining overwhelming coverage for their product, client or service.

Whether you produced an event or stunt that gained unbelievable attention, your video increased brand awareness, or you caught the eye of significant social media influencers who helped you reach a specific demographic, glory awaits you.

We feature 19 categories, meaning there is at least one that highlights your specific talents. Categories include:

  • Best Social Media Campaign
  • Best Thought Leadership Campaign
  • Best Use of New Media Platform
  • Best Media Relations Video
  • Best Brand Messaging or Positioning
  • Best Cause Advocacy Campaign
  • Best Innovation in Media Relations
  • Media Relations Campaign of the Year

Enter now for your chance to gain worldwide recognition for your outstanding success.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed https://ift.tt/2GwgtWs

As publishers flee Facebook, LinkedIn rises

Publishers and brands are increasingly turning to LinkedIn because of diminishing organic reach on Facebook.

Facebook recently announced that it will prioritize posts of users’ personal contacts and show fewer posts from publishers and other businesses in news feeds. LinkedIn, meanwhile, has implemented numerous changes that make it more attractive for content marketers.

Since being purchased by Microsoft, LinkedIn has added native video, enhanced its search features and improved its news feed algorithm to show more relevant content. LinkedIn’s professional audience is attractive for B2B product promotion, and it’s increasingly becoming a publisher-friendly hotspot.

[RELATED: Weave storytelling into every corporate communication, and craft copy that captures your brand voice.]

LinkedIn emerges as a content-sharing network

Readership and engagement of the top 100 best performing articles on LinkedIn quadrupled over the past two years, according to NewsWhip.

“If nothing else, this proves that LinkedIn is becoming a genuine force as a platform where people read and engage with content, and as such it is worth paying attention to which publishers’ content is having the most success on LinkedIn,” writes Benedict Nicholson, a NewsWhip editorial researcher.

In terms of engagement on LinkedIn, top publishers for the second half of 2017 were Forbes, Business Insider and NBC—in that order. Top performing content focused on workplace advice for new employees preparing for job interviews and decision-making tips for veteran executives. Types of articles that performed well included:

  • The “one thing” theme, which tells the reader something that can add a positive or remove a negative from their life, such as an article titled, “The one word that can hurt your reputation at work”
  • Job advice, such as answers to challenging job interview questions
  • “CEO worship,” examples of how the best CEOs operate, communicate and lead

NewsWhip offers these tips for LinkedIn publishing:

Know the platform. LinkedIn is not like other social media channels. It was founded as a job advice site, and it still has that orientation. Content that succeeds on the platform reflects that job-centric tilt. For example, The New York Times enjoys outstanding engagement on Facebook and Twitter, but its content is not always conducive to lighting up LinkedIn engagement.

Size up your competition. Who are your rivals, and which strategies are they succeeding with on LinkedIn? Learn as much as you can about the major players in your field.

Know the content that works. Workplace advice performs well now, but that could change. Make sure you’re on top of evolving content trends.

Use social media data to perfect your strategy. “There’s no better way to see if your content is working than to see if the numbers back it up,” Nicholson says. Test different types of content and sharing methods until you find what works best for your strategy.

Publishers leave Facebook for LinkedIn

Despite earlier struggles and hesitance to dive into LinkedIn, many publishers plan to place less emphasis on Facebook and more on LinkedIn this year, according to Digiday. Although LinkedIn is known as a professional network, consumer publications expect to publish more content on the network or are exploring LinkedIn publishing options.

The Times has announced plans to make the network a priority, and HuffPost UK is developing work-related videos and text articles for the professional network.

Financial Times, The Economist and CNBC are testing native videos on the platform. Some results have been significant. The Economist’s video on artificially grown meat generated 2,000 likes and a few dozen comments. Engagement on LinkedIn—comments, “likes” and shares—increased more than 60 percent year-over-year due to product updates, new features and improved analytics, Digiday reports.

Facebook’s algorithm changes that thwart publishers’ ability to reach audiences account for some of the increased interest in LinkedIn. Due to Facebook’s constant algorithm tweaks—some of which have proved fatal for certain publishers—brand managers have started viewing Facebook as an unreliable source of referral traffic.

As publishers migrate to LinkedIn, businesses may also find a significant audience for content marketing and PR initiatives on the professional network. Content on business subjects will probably be well received. However, LinkedIn remains a relatively small driver of website traffic for most brands.

“The answer will most probably lie in a more diverse approach, gaining numbers on various platforms to supplement any Facebook declines—while also working to learn and adapt to the new Facebook reality,” says Andrew Hutchinson at Social Media Today.

A version of this post first appeared on the Glean.info blog.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed https://ift.tt/2I6EmVq

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Infographic: 8 alternatives to yet another stock photo

Your stock photos aren’t fooling anyone.

Although an image of young professionals perched on nondescript office furniture is better than nothing, it’s not much better. There are superior alternatives for content creators looking to go the extra mile.

This infographic from Venngage offers enterprising communicators eight options to grab reader attention without resorting to the banal offerings from a stock photo service.

They include the following suggestions:

  1. Use bold and bright colors.
  2. Create icons to illustrate concepts.
  3. Visualize data with infographics.
  4. Create custom GIFs.
[RELATED: Create videos, infographics and images that "wow," even on a shoestring budget.]

See the full infographic below to learn how you can transform your content into visually engaging—and unique—creations that will wow readers and drive traffic:



from PR Daily News Feed https://ift.tt/2Gih7XR

Heineken pulls ad many called ‘terribly racist’

Controversy can get your organization in headlines—but it can also send your PR team scrambling for a response.

Heineken recently experienced this after its newest commercial drew a backlash.

USA Today reported:

In the 30-second advertisement, a bartender slides a bottle of Heineken Light towards a woman. The beer passes several men and women of color before reaching her and then the statement "Sometimes Lighter is Better" appears.

The PR headache for the beer maker grew after Chance the Rapper tweeted the following:

Though some disagreed with the rapper and said his comments were “reaching” for a meaning that Heineken didn’t intend, others agreed, tweeting comments such as this:

[RELATED: Prepare, protect and promote your organization and brand in a climate of crisis.]

The discussion prompted many headlines about Heineken that included the phrase “terribly racist.”

On Monday, Heineken pulled the ad and sent a statement to the BBC, which read, in part:

"While we feel the ad is referencing our Heineken Light beer, we missed the mark, are taking the feedback to heart and will use this to influence future campaigns."

The company’s latest campaign might have missed the mark, but Heineken has previously been lauded for its ads.

CNN Money reported:

Heineken had previously navigated sensitive issues more successfully.

In the aftermath of the Pepsi ad controversy last year, the beer brand was praised for an ad entitled "Worlds Apart" that addressed gay rights, climate change and feminism.

"For decades, Heineken has developed a positive track record for creating marketing that shows there's more that unites us than divides us," Trowery said Monday.

The beer maker is also not the only organization that has faced criticism for its marketing messages.

USA Today reported:

Heineken's commercial is just the latest brand cited for insensitivity. International retailer H&M lost celebrity endorser the Weekend and rapper G-Easy -- and faced online criticism from Lebron James and others -- in January for an ad in the U.K. featuring a black boy modeling a sweatshirt emblazoned with the words "coolest monkey in the jungle."

In the past year, Pepsi and Dove also were forced to apologize and pull ads after backlash grew—the first after releasing a protest-themed commercial featuring Kendall Jenner, and the latter for an ad that many called racist.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed https://ift.tt/C6XkMv

How to get a U.K. brand noticed by U.S. media

PR is the same, no matter the continent.

While the days of wine-fueled lunches with editors might (largely) be over, PR professionals still spend much of their day courting the media. Meeting a journalist, even if it’s only for 10 minutes over coffee, is an opportunity to tell them precisely what your business or client does, positioning them as go-to experts whenever a comment is needed.

This is hardly a problem in the UK where even a trip across the country, between London and Edinburgh say, can be done in a day. It’s also straightforward enough to pick up the phone and have a conversation with someone in the newsroom, knowing that we are in the same time zone and share an understanding of how the British press operates.

Building relationships with journalists in the US, on the other hand, is certainly a challenge when you have few opportunities to talk to them in person. You might speak the same language—but differences in writing style and media culture more generally can lead to UK PR teams pitching news stories and features that are of little interest to stateside audiences. Add to that different time zones, deadlines and public holidays, and it might be extremely difficult to catch a reporter at their desk.

Navigating the intricacies of the press takes time—something you don’t always have when a client wants to raise their profile in another country quickly.

[RELATED: Join us in New York City for the PR & Media Relations Conference.]

In the digital age, of course, there is no excuse for not getting to know the journalists and publications you are pitching.The Wall Street Journal, New York Times and San Francisco Chronicle are all available online, and it’s easy to see what reporters write about and connect with them on social media. If you can’t get hold of them on the phone, a tweet or LinkedIn message alerting them to your story is another option, just as it is when pitching anywhere else.

What U.S. journalists want

If British PR teams do their homework, there is no reason why they can’t enjoy a similar success in the US to that which they have at home. Demand for quality content is nearly universal, although the editorial guidelines can be vastly different. While some of the more “academic” publications might ask you to follow a strict set of rules on style and content, which is less common in the UK, others are prepared to accept more direct, product-driven articles.

to win over a journalist. Remember that when a business moves into new markets, they bring with them fresh perspectives and knowledge that have possibly never been published in that country before.

Don’t be afraid to travel

Occasionally, PR professionals who are serious about building lasting relationships with journalists in the US (or anywhere else) need to go out of their way to meet them. Just as important as getting the latest industry insights is the opportunity to network with journalists and secure coverage in relevant titles, both immediately after a meeting and in the long-term.

Despite the obvious discrepancies in spelling and tone-of-voice, which can easily be accommodated, working with the US journalists is not all that different to pitching ideas in the U.K. Editorial teams on both sides of the pond face similar challenges, including declining print sales and advertising revenue, and staff shortages in the newsroom. As in the UK, some reporters prefer a phone call, while others respond better to emails; some have time for a long conversation and others would rather you get to the point quickly.

More than anything, you should never lose sight of the fact that respected journalists want interesting and engaging content, wherever they are in the world.

Dan Trussel is a senior account manager for Tank, a PR agency based in Nottingham, England.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed https://ift.tt/2pLqtVG

5 things editors wish you knew about the content you’re pitching

Editors want your content—and they want a great pitch.

Every company has its own unique marketing and PR needs—but if you’re in the field, you know that pitching content and working alongside your media contacts at publications are important across the board. Unfortunately, that doesn’t mean marketing and PR pros do a bang-up job every time they send off those pitch emails.

If you want to contribute guest posts and earn a byline yourself, or if you want to successfully pitch your sources to editors, then you must deliver what those editors require.

It helps when you know exactly what that is—which is why we asked them.

In our report, “The State of Digital Media 2018,” we surveyed editors at publications across industries and analyzed more than 3.5 million pieces of published content to better understand what separates the winning content from the countless deleted pitches.

Here are five things to keep in mind when pitching your would-be media friends:

1. There’s more opportunity than you think.

You’re on your devices all day, and so is everyone else. We’re constantly consuming content: reading, watching videos and listening to podcasts.

Editors know this and 76 percent of them publish up to 10 guest posts each week. What’s more, 94 percent of editors we surveyed said they plan to maintain or increase the amount of guest content they publish. Growing their audiences and keeping visitors engaged means they need to publish loads of high-quality content consistently, and with the right pitches, you can help editors meet that need.

2. Editors are looking for more than just written articles.

Editors publish a ton of written content, and that shouldn’t come as a surprise. Written content is one of the most easily scalable and effective ways to reach audiences, which makes it popular among thought leaders and editors alike—but it’s not the only format editors and their audiences are open to.

When asked what other forms of media they planned to publish this year, 67 percent of editors said video content, 52 percent said infographics, and 40 percent said podcasts.

Does this mean you should stop contributing written pieces? Absolutely not, but it does mean that providing a little variety can go a long way toward helping editors.

[RELATED: Weave storytelling into every corporate communication, and craft copy that captures your brand voice.]

3. Your overly promotional content is a problem.

Marketers and PR pros are responsible for a lot, including brand building and promotion. Unfortunately, that promotion can creep its way into what’s supposed to be high-value educational content, and that leads to rejection.

Nearly 8 out of 10 editors surveyed cited excessive promotion as the biggest problem with content they’re pitched.

Focus on your audience, not yourself. If your content is valuable (and you promote that content effectively), you’ll get a brand boost even if you never mention your company, services or products.

4. Publications need more content during certain times of year.

Audiences (and therefore editors) need content throughout the year—but would it surprise you that editors are looking for more pitches at certain times? Editors expressed a greater need for contributed content during the winter holiday season than any other time, followed by June, July and August, when contributed content tends to drop off.

By submitting ideas right around (or even a little before) these time periods, you may have a stronger chance of getting your work published.

5. Success is more than social shares.

Like you, editors measure their content’s performance. That doesn’t necessarily mean you’re using the same metrics to gauge guest post success, though, so it’s important to make sure you understand what matters to them.

For instance, 93 percent of editors use page views as a metric. Seventy-five percent look at the time readers spend on their websites, and 69 percent use social shares. If you can make an impact on the metrics that matter to editors, your chances of contributing again will increase.

Kelsey Raymond is the president of Influence & Co., a content marketing firm that specializes in helping companies showcase their expertise through thought leadership.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed https://ift.tt/2pFPfGY

The 4-Step Plan to Build a Better Ambassador Program