Friday, September 30, 2016

5 PR insights from ‘Stranger Things’

A lot of virtual ink has been spilled decrying and/or celebrating Netflix’s latest hit “Stranger Things.”

The show, based on Stephen King’s novel, is an avalanche of nostalgia harking back to the 1980s and monsters under the bed (or in the wall).

With the same wearying inevitability that the monsters are vanquished and the good guys prevail, here are five PR lessons from “Stranger Things”:

1. Cleverly used clichés don’t deserve the name.

The shadowy government lab, kids saving the day and (eventually redeemed) jock boyfriend climbing through the window were all elements of the show that viewers loved.

It’s easy to call these things clichés—and handled clumsily, they probably would be. However, with a little love and craft—and through remixing and recasting these in different combinations—“Stranger Things” manages to create something that feels both new and familiar. That’s what makes it wildly popular.

We know that these aren’t lazy writing crutches, but carefully curated motifs woven together with skill. We appreciate them because they transcend the pejorative label of ‘cliché’.

A good PR campaign can do the same. A recent example is Always’ #LikeAGirl campaign:

It’s based on a hackneyed (and damaging) cliché: that “doing things like a girl” is to do them in an inferior way. Always then reversed the cliché, creating a powerful campaign that resonated widely. The video above has more than 62 million views at the time of publishing.

2. Misconceptions deserve to die.

These include, “Never work with child actors.” I challenge anyone to watch “Stranger Things” from start to finish and criticize the performance of Millie Bobby Brown, Caleb McLaughlin, Gaten Matarazzo and the remaining young actors.

We can look at past experiences (such as the first “Harry Potter” movie) to confirm our negative biases as a lazy alternative to thought.

There are a number of misconceptions and old ways of thinking that we can do without in PR (thanks, “Absolutely Fabulous,” for the “PR darling” shtick).

One that stands out is the humble press release. Simultaneously praised as the PR panacea and reviled as the ghost of the bad old days, the truth is somewhere in between.

RELATED: Get the newest advances in PR measurement, media relations and PR storytelling at PR Daily World in NYC.

Steal a page from the casting directors for “Stranger Things”: Take things on a case-by-case basis and don’t get stuck in aphoristic thinking.

3. Know your audience—and hit them in the “feels.”

This is crucial when you’re designing a campaign that delivers a left hook to consumers’ nostalgia glands. “Stranger Things” works because of perfect timing in two ways:

1. It rides the wave of the TV revival spearheaded by the likes of “Breaking Bad” and “Game of Thrones” that has put TV right up there with movies in terms of cultural currency.

2. It nails the age of its audience with its release date.

1980s nostalgia wouldn’t work in the 1990s when the past fads were relatively recent. It probably won’t work in 2050, either (unless it takes the place of “Downton Abbey’s” historical niche).

“Stranger Things” gets it right because the creators knows that the people it is likely to appeal to are fall into the prime Netflix consumer demographic—anyone from their late 20s (weaned on ‘90s re-runs) to those nearing 50.

“Stranger Things” is a masterpiece of audience profiling as much as storytelling.

Compare “Stranger Things” to another recent nostalgia-phenomenon, Pokémon Go. The game swept consumers around the world, but mainly got nostalgic juices flowing for those who grew up with the original games and cartoons (millennials). “Stranger Things,” by contrast, is popular with millennials—but also appeals to Generation X-ers and younger baby boomers.

If you’re a brand manager looking for popularity, which works better? Are you trying to sell products to tech-savvy millennials—or are you trying to hit executives in their 40s with a B2B campaign?

4. Take your audience where they’ve never been before.

The “small town America” setting of “Stranger Things” is instantly recognizable from sources as such as the first “Rambo” film, “The Breakfast Club” and “Family Guy.”

It shows that you don’t have to create everything from scratch. Sometimes a familiar backdrop can do much of the work for you. It can call to mind a set of ideas and feelings that you can draw upon to tell a story or put an audience in a certain mental state.

5. Don’t send consumers to the “upside down.”

The “upside down” is a dark, distorted reflection of our own world. In “Stranger Things,” it’s where Will is trapped, the monsters live and Barb dies.

Don’t let your campaign do that to Barb your consumers.

The upside down is an example of the discomfort we feel when something is eerily familiar, but not quite right. It rarely makes for a good PR campaign.

Amazon’s marketing campaign for “The Man in the High Castle” showed this. With the show set in an alternative world where the Axis powers won the war and Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan share control of the United States, Amazon decided to paint New York subway seats in a design of the Stars and Stripes altered with Nazi imagery.

The familiar-but-wrong theme echoed the show’s content, but it wasn’t the most tasteful—or popular—of moves.

Chris Bowman is an account manager at Aspectus PR. A version of this appeared on the firm’s blog.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2dKI63x

2016 U.S. Presidential Election: Would Hillary Clinton supporters support Bernie Sanders if he won the nomination?

I am a Hillary Clinton supporter. I will absolutely support Sanders if he wins the nomination.

There's a lot of flak between Clinton and Sanders supporters that I find unnecessary and frankly bizarre. I think a lot of the tension between Clinton and Sanders supporters is nicely explained by looking at through the lens of ideology vs pragmatism, as spelled out here:

2 ways of assessing political candidates, and how they explain the Clinton-Sanders conflict

I prefer Hillary because I believe she's better positioned to get things done. Sanders would likely face the same obstinate obstructionism that Obama has, and I prefer a candidate who is less ideologically aligned with me but accomplished more of the things I value to a candidate who is more ideologically aligned with me but accomplishes less.

Politics is not about zeal or ideological purity, it's about working with people you might not like or agree with to get things done--something the more fanatically inclined on both sides of the aisle would do well to remember. Zeal and fanaticism do not create good governance. They never have.

That said, I think both Hillary and Bernie would make fine Presidents, and certainly both of them are head and shoulders above the rolling clown car catastrophe that is what's left of the Republican party these days.



Read other answers by Franklin Veaux on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2cGpYrG

Investor Relations Study: IR Websites Essential for Investors’ “Buyer’s Journey”

owned-media-essential-in-investors-buyers-journeyFrom an owned media marketing perspective, an investor relations website is an essential property – not dissimilar to a trade show booth. You never know when a prospect is going to walk by and make a purely visceral judgment.

In the case of an institutional investor (90%), visiting an IR website must be a surface-level, emotional “kicking-of-the-tires” as they already have access to all your past performance data and in-depth analysts’ reports.

They want to understand how you represent your “financial brand.”

q3_2016_ir-shareholder-study

Combine this information with the first question in our study, and there is no question about the need to have an IR website to build confidence with Wall Street.

For more on the Shareholder Confidence 365 Study, request the full 30-page hardcopy report now.

Request a Copyof IR Study


About the study

Initially launched in 2012, the Shareholder Confidence 365 Study is an ongoing survey targeted at two key constituents with whom public companies communicate: institutional investors and individual investors. It was the first study of its kind — directly asking investors how they consume investor relations content. In 2014, we published an updated study.

For this 2016 iteration, we have segmented and compared the results between institutional investors and individual investors. To date. we have accumulated over 6,870 responses from a pool of 16,000 buy-side analysts & portfolio managers and from over 15,000 long-term holding retail investors. There are 29 questions.

Questions include:

  • How often do you visit IR websites?
  • Why do you visit IR websites?
  • Do you use Twitter for stock research?
  • Would a CEO video instill trust?
  • Do you use earnings estimates?

The inbound response ratio is 1:3, Wall Street to Main Street. All of the data is unedited, except for any typos within the comments and the exclusion of inappropriate comments.

Click here to request the free Shareholder Confidence 365 Study.

 Author Bradley H. Smith is Director of Marketing, Investor Relations and Compliance Services at PR Newswire and Vintage.



from Blogs http://ift.tt/2djaoju

Coming soon: Facebook at Work

PR and marketing teams might soon be using Facebook for more than scheduling branded posts and checking their personal newsfeeds.

Facebook at Work—a rival to enterprise communication platforms such as Yammer and Slack—is set to be launched at an event in London on Oct. 10.

“It will be the first time that Facebook has launched a global product outside of its U.S. home market,” Techcrunch reported.

Facebook has been testing the service since 2015 with a selected group of organizations. The rollout will offer employees the opportunity to connect, collaborate and keep track of projects inside a familiar format.

It might also encourage employees to remain active—or become more involved—with organizations’ social media efforts. For PR and marketers struggling to be heard above the online noise, getting employees accustomed to using a Facebook product might boost brand storytelling through their organizations’ staff.

RELATED: Want to get your employees involved and active online? Download our free guide: 6 steps to crafting an internal social media plan.

CNet reported:

The service is expected to be similar to rivals such as Yammer and Slack. A company's employees use these tools to communicate and collaborate, cutting down on email chains and other old hat ways of working. Facebook's version will be similar to the social network we're familiar with, boasting a news feed and mobile apps for iOS and Android.

Through a video and on the Facebook at Work website, Facebook showed how its corporate product works. Users must create new accounts, which exist separate from personal accounts—though they work in a similar way.

Engadget further explained:

As we've seen during the trial run, Facebook at Work uses familiar communication tools like the News Feed, Groups, Events and a dedicated Messenger app, all powered by the same algorithm as Facebook itself, except dedicated to the chatter within your company rather than your friends and the general public. One interesting -- and potentially dystopian -- twist the company has reportedly been pitching alongside the Facebook at Work product is the potential to use artificial intelligence to determine employee sentiment. In other words, Facebook at Work will be able to learn how employees feel about topics within the company, so be careful what you say about the boss in those backchannel messages.

The ease of collaborating won’t come free. CIO reported:

In December, the company said its social network for business would be free at launch and it would eventually charge for additional support, analytics and integration with enterprise collaboration tools, such as Microsoft Azure, Office 365, Google Apps, Box and Dropbox.

However, The Information reported that Facebook will charge organizations for its service based upon the number of employees who use it.

Techcrunch’s Josh Constine said Facebook is gearing up to partner with other companies to provide additional tools and features:

Facebook believes it can keep individual employees engaged with the product, so it’s betting on a pricing plan that charges companies “per monthly active user” instead of charging a flat rate per company, says Facebook @ Work director Julien Codorniou. TechCrunch has learned that Facebook will announce launch integrations or partnerships with other SaaS tool providers including Asana.

Constine continued:

That could make it lucrative for Facebook to get every single member of a company signed up, from executives to assistants. And if the product doesn’t stick, employers won’t have to pay for empty seats.

What do you think of the service, PR Daily readers? How do you think it’ll affect PR and marketing teams’ workflows?



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2dfrmQW

Are people in England really so kind?

To quote myself from When you pay someone to do something, should you still thank them?:

"In the UK people say thank you ...

  • ... to bus drivers when we are getting off.
  • ... to supermarket checkout girls when they give us change.
  • ... to bar staff when they give us our drinks.
  • ... to waitresses when they clear our table.
  • ... to cinema ushers when they return our ticket stubs.
  • ... to the postman when he hands us the mail.
  • ... to the doctor when he gives us our prescription and ...
  • ... to the chemist when they fill it out.
  • ... to binmen when they take a heavy rubbish bag off our hands.
  • ... to the gas/electricity/water meter reader when they've done their checks.
  • ... to the paper boy/girl when they bring the local rag.
  • ... to the dentist even after they've pulled your teeth out.
  • ... to hairdressers after the cut, even if it's not quite what you wanted.
  • ... to the car park attendant after you've just paid a fortune for 20 minutes.
  • ... to anyone who does anything for you in fact, whether you paid or it's free.

Why? Because manners cost nothing and everyone feels good about it."

We tend to think that a little politeness goes a long way. 'Please' and 'thank you' are well-used words in the UK. It can take some getting used to when, like me, you live in a country where people rarely say them.

Read other related questions on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2dq7JpO

Which event in life made you cry as though you'd never stop?

A lot of this time is a blur to me. It seemed as if my body had never fully had time to recover from the shock.

I had a very unique relationship with my sister. With her being severely mentally disabled, I did not truly know her as well as other siblings do. She had stayed in a perpetual state of “toddler” - never able to do things on her own, not potty trained, unable to speak in sentences. She knew words such as tio (uncle), mom, dad, and my name, Grace.

My sister had overcome a slew of health issues, and even cancer. Remission for two years until I came home from a concert when I was 16 and my family sat me down in the kitchen.

“The doctors say she is not a good candidate for a bone marrow transplant, and that we should make her comfortable for as much time as she has left.”

Two weeks later, my parents announced their divorce. I spent the next 4 months rehearsing a school play, visiting my sister at the hospice, breaking up with my HS boyfriend. She died 4 months later. You would think this is what I consider the worst part of it.

A few weeks after her death, I was very ignorant and vulnerable and started seeing a boy in my school. After some weeks, he broke up with me by changing his Myspace relationship status.

Bear with me.

I was angry and hurt, but he apologized and I figured it didn’t matter in the long run. He sent me a link over AIM asking for me to take a look at something.

He used this link to hack into my Myspace - all the pictures of me and my sister, poetry, my thoughts, all gone. He had written I’M A NAZI HORE all over the page and messaged my best friend hateful things. For no reason.

I reported this to my school, way back before cyber bullying was a thing. They said I should have better taste in men.

That is when I thought I would never stop crying. Death is natural, relationships end - but the manipulation and cruelty I experienced at such a painful time, for no reason other than (as I later found out) not knowing how to dump a girl fully, is what killed a small part of me.

This guy did “apologize” years and years later, but the damage is done. My sister is gone, my parents barely tolerate each other, and I still struggle with trust issues.

Me and my sister, 2006. RIP.



Read other answers by Grace Morales on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2dcjKhh

PR leaders, this one’s for you

It’s lonely at the top in every field, but if you’re a PR leader, the buck ALWAYS stops with you.

Now is your chance to learn, share, network and commiserate with your peers.

We’re looking for wise, experienced, inquisitive leaders for our PR Leadership Forum in Chicago.

The Leadership Forums brings together 20 to 25 PR pros in an interactive roundtable discussion homed in on your concerns and your solutions. It’s your chance to hear and be heard, and to share your knowledge in a casual, confidential setting.

We like to call it a combination of benchmarking, group therapy, idea-sharing and networking.

The next one will be held Nov. 3–4 at JLL in downtown Chicago.

Because attendees’ experiences drive the conversation, to ensure a high-level discussion we ask candidates to fill out a simple application.

We’re reviewing applications now through mid-October. Apply now!

The registration fee includes two nights’ lodging, a welcome reception on the first night; breakfast, lunch and snacks during the forum; and dinner on the second night.

You’re responsible only for airfare and the attendance fee.

Submit your application now!

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2dlJdna