Your tweets might soon become longer, though many say that’s not a positive change.
On Tuesday, Twitter announced that it was affording selected users a character limit of 280—double what users currently have:
Can’t fit your Tweet into 140 characters? 🤔
— Twitter (@Twitter) September 26, 2017
We’re trying something new with a small group, and increasing the character limit to 280! Excited about the possibilities? Read our blog to find out how it all adds up. 👇https://t.co/C6hjsB9nbL
Jack Dorsey, a Twitter co-founder and its chief executive, also tweeted the news:
This is a small change, but a big move for us. 140 was an arbitrary choice based on the 160 character SMS limit. Proud of how thoughtful the team has been in solving a real problem people have when trying to tweet. And at the same time maintaining our brevity, speed, and essence! https://t.co/TuHj51MsTu
— jack (@jack) September 6, 2017
Aliza Rosen, a Twitter product manager, and Ikuhiro Ihara, a senior software engineer at Twitter, said the change could balance issues with wording and space across languages. They wrote in the company’s blog:
Trying to cram your thoughts into a Tweet – we’ve all been there, and it’s a pain.Interestingly, this isn't a problem everywhere people Tweet. For example, when I (Aliza) Tweet in English, I quickly run into the 140 character limit and have to edit my Tweet down so it fits. Sometimes, I have to remove a word that conveys an important meaning or emotion, or I don’t send my Tweet at all. But when Iku Tweets in Japanese, he doesn’t have the same problem. He finishes sharing his thought and still has room to spare. This is because in languages like Japanese, Korean, and Chinese you can convey about double the amount of information in one character as you can in many other languages, like English, Spanish, Portuguese, or French.
We want every person around the world to easily express themselves on Twitter, so we're doing something new: we're going to try out a longer limit, 280 characters, in languages impacted by cramming (which is all except Japanese, Chinese, and Korean).
… Twitter is about brevity. It's what makes it such a great way to see what's happening. Tweets get right to the point with the information or thoughts that matter. That is something we will never change.
We understand since many of you have been Tweeting for years, there may be an emotional attachment to 140 characters – we felt it, too. But we tried this, saw the power of what it will do, and fell in love with this new, still brief, constraint. We are excited to share this today, and we will keep you posted about what we see and what comes next.
Twitter employees took to the platform to spread positive messages and additional information about the change:
It should be easy to Tweet no matter what language you speak! 🌎 Excited to share that we're trying out expanding our character limit, read more here: https://t.co/dRDHmOsskE
— Aliza Rosen (@alizar) September 26, 2017
Originally, our constraint was 160 (limit of a text) minus username. But we noticed @biz got 1 more than @jack. For fairness, we chose 140. Now texts are unlimited. Also, we realize that 140 isn't fair—there are differences between languages. We're testing the limits. Hello 280!
— Biz Stone (@biz) September 26, 2017
The graph that will change Twitter. The most impactful data science happens by asking the right questions and giving clear and compelling answers, fancy methods are often a distraction! https://t.co/Q9U97IsSVR http://pic.twitter.com/GiTwBueNYu
— Venu Satuluri (@venusatuluri) September 26, 2017
welcome to twitter we have had all along in japan
— nabokov♹ (@nabokov7) September 26, 2017
On Twitter we are all co-creating culture. As we change the rules, new behaviors emerge. Small steps reverberating globally... Excited to share this with the world! (Characters: 182)
— gasca 🔥🦉 (@gasca) September 26, 2017
[RELATED: Joins us for the Social Media #Mashup at Disneyland.]
However, many Twitter users weren’t happy with the news, tweeting with snark and derision:
http://pic.twitter.com/N4G8tgckQw
— Brian Barone (@brianrbarone) September 26, 2017
If we wanted to read essays we would log into Facebook so it's a no from me. #280characters http://pic.twitter.com/EvrOJXpTJU
— Sheldon Cameron (@Sheldon_Cameron) September 27, 2017
The perfect gif for this nonsense. #280characters http://pic.twitter.com/Du0YP0ys2X
— Austin (@AustinCTweets) September 27, 2017
I’m so excited to be part of @Twitter’s #280characters rollout. Let me just say it’s an honor and a privilege. I’d like to thank my wonderf
— Ellen DeGeneres (@TheEllenShow) September 27, 2017
The 280-character limit is a terrible idea. The whole beauty of Twitter is that it forces you to express your ideas concisely (1/47)
— James Poniewozik (@poniewozik) September 26, 2017
Let’s just not even pretend like #280characters is a good idea, @Twitter.
— deray mckesson (@deray) September 27, 2017
Dear Twitter, be careful what you wish for. #140Characters #280Characters http://pic.twitter.com/Tab6BEPn9I
— James Melville (@JamesMelville) September 27, 2017
Firmly against Twitter going to #280characters. If the platform produces art like this, why change it? http://pic.twitter.com/zz0u2eQb14
— Paddy Power (@paddypower) September 27, 2017
Here’s why I, a prolific Twitter user, do not like this change: As Rosen acknowledges, Twitter is about brevity. It is supposed to make you think about removing words to make your thoughts snappier and your messages more concise. In a world filled with way too much overly long writing, Twitter brings back word and character limits that force you to get to the point.
To his credit, Dorsey has been responding to criticism through his profile:
We expected (and ❤️!) all the snark & critique for #280characters. Comes with the job. What matters now is we clearly show why this change is important, and prove to you all it’s better. Give us some time to learn and confirm (or challenge!) our ideas. https://t.co/qJrzzIluMw
— jack (@jack) September 27, 2017
Though most active Twitter users don’t seem to like the change, the site’s overlords are probably hoping the feature will make the platform more enticing for new users—something it has struggled to gain (along with additional advertising revenue).
However, the risk of driving current users to leave Twitter might prompt platform executives to ax the longer tweets.
Marketing Land’s Tim Peterson wrote:
By relaxing the maximum length of a tweet, Twitter would hope to make itself more inviting to people previously frustrated by its forced brevity but could risk alienating others for whom that brevity makes their feeds more easily scannable. The delicate balance between risk and reward suggests why Twitter has not committed to the change. Instead, the company will use the test to see how people respond to seeing longer tweets and how the option to write longer affects the length of a typical tweet.
The Verge’s Casey Newton wrote:
… [S]uper-sized tweets are likely to change the nature of the network as more people gain access to them, and in unpredictable ways. Will those multi-message “tweetstorms” shrink into a smaller number of tweets, or will the expanded real estate encourage people to write even more? What new kinds of jokes and memes are possible at 280 characters that were not possible at 140? Will 280 characters allow for just enough nuance and diplomacy that we may be able to avert global thermonuclear war?
If double-size tweets are here to stay, PR and marketing pros would be wise to take up that additional space only when 140 characters cannot do.
from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2yHdVBO
No comments:
Post a Comment