Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Merriam-Webster declares ‘hot dog’ a sandwich; Twitter users bite back

What began as a harmless ode to some common Memorial Day cuisine quickly turned into an array of angry and confused tweets aimed at Merriam-Webster’s social media team.

Here’s how brand managers wished their Twitter followers a happy holiday:

Merriam-Webster defines “sandwich” as:

1. Two or more slices of bread or a split roll having a filling in between.
2. One slice of bread covered with food.

Here’s how its editors define “hot dog”:

frankfurter ; especially : a frankfurter heated and served in a long split roll.

The word hot dog refers either to the sausage that you buy squeezed in a plastic package with 7 or so of its kind, or to the same sausage heated and served in a long split roll.

When it's served in the roll, it's also a sandwich.

Pretty close, right? For some, maybe not.

Many people who follow Merriam-Webster for the latest word-related news made their stance on the encased meat definition abundantly clear: A hot dog is not a sandwich.

Twitter users aired their grievances where the debate began—on Merriam-Webster’s profile. Some went as far as to say they no longer trust the dictionary as a resource, or that Merriam-Webster was ruining Memorial Day:

Others relished in taking Merriam-Webster’s side:

Social media managers for a well-known Chicago eatery also served up their reaction:

Dictionary editors seemed to know that their, um, frank assessment would have users boiling over with confusion, and they addressed the imminent controversy in the article “10 kinds of sandwiches”:

We know: the idea that a hot dog is a sandwich is heresy to some of you. But given that the definition of sandwich is "two or more slices of bread or a split roll having a filling in between," there is no sensible way around it. If you want a meatball sandwich on a split roll to be a kind of sandwich, then you have to accept that a hot dog is also a kind of sandwich.

Whether you like your hot dogs grilled, boiled, broiled or charred, Merriam-Webster says to call it a sandwich.

What do you think, PR Daily readers? Should Merriam-Webster have bitten its tongue on this one? Also, where do you side on this culinary controversy?

(Image via)

from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/1TVWqUo

No comments:

Post a Comment