If a law were to target actual characteristics of weapons used in mass murder, what would it focus on? Magazine capacity? Rate of fire?
An analysis of weapons used in mass shootings comes up with this:
As you can see, weapon choice doesn’t make mass shootings much more deadly. And there is only a slight preference for “assault weapons” over what’s typically being sold.
Note: My source data is the mother jones mass shooting data.
So if you really want to impact mass shootings, you better ban ALL handguns and ALL semi-auto rifles and shotguns. All of them.
In addition to being directly forbidden by Heller vs. DC, such a move would be wildly unpopular with the vast majority of Americans.
Any other ban proposal is by it’s nature worthless.
Read other answers by Chris Everett on Quora:
- In the United States, are supporters of gun rights fighting for more people to have easier access to as many guns as possible? Why or why not?
-
Is the only way to stop gun crime in the USA a total ban on guns - with a 2 week amnesty, to give them up - then making it a criminal offence to have a gun?
- Why was the ban on assault rifles lifted?
from Quora http://ift.tt/2aCu7eD
No comments:
Post a Comment