This is a false dilemma.
Why think that “according to the Bible” the earth is 6,000 years old? That's one interpretation that I and many others think is unnecessarily literal. And that's not a modern accommodation to science. That idea has been around since at least Augustine in the 4th century.
This is another one of those attempts to make it seem like science and religion are opposed to one another, when in fact they are not. There is no choice that needs to be made here.
Read other answers by Clay Stanton on Quora:
- Why can science fact check the Bible but it can't be the other way around?
- How did Jesus and the Apostles earn money?
- As a Christian, do you believe everything the Bible says?
from Quora http://ift.tt/2lMxuV2
No comments:
Post a Comment