Tuesday, January 31, 2017

How technology has changed PR agencies

This article was originally published on PR Daily in February 2016.

Change is inevitable.

It’s how we adapt that enables us to learn and grow. PR pros must be well-versed in change, and PR, advertising and marketing agencies have transformed over the last five to 10 years.

Here's how agency pros have updated their roles in an era of social media and tech changes to remain relevant in today's increasingly digital world:

Demonstrating ROI

PR pros, digital marketing gurus and advertising junkies have taken “traditional” and thrown it out the window. No longer are the days where brands want their agencies showing up to the big show dressed in a suit and tie.

We’ve become creative risk-takers, but agencies cannot always relate their work directly back to ROI—leading to being evaluated more critically.

Many brands prioritize channels that directly show ROI. Jeremy Mullman, senior vice president of Olson Engage, explains how today’s earned media can demonstrate value:

PR agencies that are creating content are generally doing so without the luxury of large paid media budgets that guarantee what you create is going to be seen. What we’re doing is using our expertise in earning media coverage to create stories that media outlets and their readers will want to publish and share. It’s a lot harder in some ways, but the ROI when you get it right is astronomical.

Combining traditional and digital

Today, a short video or picture tells a story on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter, as well as promotes brand awareness.

At first, many brand managers used social media to “stay with the times,” but now they see value with engagement, customer service and advertising. Traditional advertising still exists, but ad agencies are now forced to create other sectors (such as digital teams) to close the gaps that some brands have previously ignored (including digital and social media advertising).

On the other hand, digital agencies have started successfully integrating traditional marketing initiatives. Michael Mothner, founder and CEO of digital marketing agency Wpromote, explains the positive effect it’s had within agencies:

“PR, digital marketing, SEO and social all used to work within their own silos,” says Mothner. “Now we integrate each to share knowledge and findings, content and creative, and in turn produce more engaged customers and better results for our clients.”

RELATED: Motivate employees with digital communications that inspire.

Brand managers’ future direction

In the early 2000s, brand managers weren’t able to engage with their audiences as easily as they can today. Now you can interact with your fans immediately through real-time channels.

This becomes difficult, as sometimes brand managers have to do this in 140 characters or less. Susan Credle, chief creative officer at Leo Burnett USA, asks if we’re still thinking of the brand down the road.

“It drives short-term thinking, but does it do anything to build a long-term brand?” Credle told Mashable. “Sometimes as an industry I think we’re trying to be so visible in the moment that I’m not sure we’re being substantive.”

It’s crucial to keep in mind the real-time aspect of today’s channels but not dilute your brand’s voice and messaging. All messaging, communication and content creation should align with the long-term brand vision.

These real-time channels have also immensely impacted crisis management and customer service.

Ulrich Gartner, founder of Gartner Communications, says that social media has changed the way crisis communication works, but many of the fundamentals remain the same. The speed of communication has dramatically changed.

Prior to social media, journalists call in updates so they could inform the public. Today, response times and updates are expected to be rapid-fire, and stakeholders, support groups and activists can take down a brand in minutes.

Daily and national publications and TV news channels aren’t the only ones that are deemed important in today’s society. Any reporter or influential social media can tweet about a crisis and either inform people or spread rumors.

How PR pros can adapt

We’re continuing to adapt to these changes for our clients. Many agencies and their employees are erasing the fine line between traditional and digital and moving towards becoming creative professionals. In order to respect client, audience and fan expectations, there’s a few things we can to do:

1. PR professionals must have clear and correct information if and when a crisis arises.

Although we want to relay information as timely as possible, it’s best to have correct and concise information prior to posting online.

Get it right the first time. An apology for wrong information can be forgiven quickly, wrong information and angry audience members can also escalate the situation for the worse.

2. Get approval and publish statements on social media, rather than traditional press releases.

Press releases can often go through several revisions and take more time to craft than a social media message. Gain approval to submit a statement on social media instead spending time on an entire press release.

3. Make users’ experience a priority.

When creating a plan for a campaign or hopping on a trending topic, keep your consumers in mind.

Integrate SEO, PR and social media in your efforts to close any gaps. This way, brand awareness will be achieved in the entire marketing mix.

Samantha Isdale is an SEO analyst for digital marketing agency Wpromote.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/1NSv8GR

Why you should target potential clients at a Ragan event

Ragan conferences attract nearly 2,500 attendees each year to the headquarters of top organizations such as Microsoft, Facebook, Disney, Coca-Cola, Con Edison and many others.

But why do vendors, agencies and consultants want to be there?

1. The Ragan event audience is a targeted market. Sponsors meet managers, directors, VPs and department heads in corporate communications, public affairs, HR communications, digital marketing, employee communications, public relations, marketing, social media and many other fields. Our attendees come from a variety of industries and organizations including aerospace, Fortune 1000 companies, nonprofit, finance, retail, government, hospitality, education and more.

2. Ragan gets creative to get people connected. Ragan offers a mix of traditional and inventive sponsorship opportunities, such as speaking as an industry innovator in a session or keynote, hosting a bonus breakfast or lunch session with demonstrations, wooing a niche group of attendees at a dine-around, displaying top work or demos at an exhibitor booth or presenting a TED-style talk to inspire new business.

3. Ragan makes it easy—and fun! Traveling, setting up big displays, preparing a presentation and networking all take time and energy. Ragan’s staff works hard to simplify the process and to put sponsors and sales teams at ease so they can focus more on building business and less on the details.

Check out the Ragan event lineup, and let us know you’re interested.

  1. Internal Communications Best Practices
    March 8-10, 2016 – Chicago, IL
  1. Speechwriter’s Conference
    March 22-24, 2017 – Washington, D.C. – Hosted by National Education Association
  1. Social Media Conference for PR, Marketing and Corporate Communicators at Disney World
    March 27-29, 2017 – Lake Buena Vista, FL – Hosted by Disney Parks
    *Act fast! Opportunities at this annual Ragan event sell out quick.
  1. Health Care Communicators Conference
    May 1-3, 2017 – Baltimore, MD – Hosted by Johns Hopkins

Email or call Kristin Farmer, kristinf@ragan.com or 312-960-4405, for a full list of open opportunities and a custom quote.

Click here for more information on sponsorship on our site

(Image via)

from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2jUnGHr

What are the sneakiest, most under-the-radar methods of cheating on tests?

The only one that ever caught me was the lost test technique. A student will dutifully take a test, but then not turn it in. Then they play dumb and say “I turned one in…I don’t know what happened!”

They have, of course, kept the test and now work on getting the answers on their own time, and with the benefit of the internet (obviously).

You only get to use this one once - and it often doesn’t work. When I “lose” a test, I make the student retake it on the spot, and I always have multiple versions, one of which I don’t use. That unused version is the makeup. I warn them about this ahead of time, by the way.

Why do I warn them? Because a sneaky student pulled this one off my first year teaching.

Old dogs…we know all the tricks. ;)



Read other answers by Dave Consiglio on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2kPBQLm

What are your most controversial or unpopular opinions?

I, as a gay teen, think

That it’s absurd that gay/lesbian/bi/pan people get offended when others assume them to be straight.

Them: (sees ring on finger) How’s the wife?

Gay guy: !%!^@%^!%^#%

I don’t get it.

News flash: we’re the statistical minority and regardless of how much society accepts LGBT+ people, we’re always going to be a minority. There’s no way around it.

And sure, you can get around the issue by simply asking ‘How’s the spouse?’ but since the majority of people are straight, they’re going to assume you’re straight since that’s the orientation of most people they’re exposed to. Assuming someone is straight has a failure rate of at most 10%, and it doesn’t cause harm. It’s a non-issue. Correct them (if it’s safe) and move on.

Parents of gay boys will continue to ask about a girlfriend, like my parents have. Inform them, and move on. It’s a one time issue, once they know, they won’t make the same mistake. It’s not worth getting upset about.

Move on.

And for the bad parents or colleagues, classmates, roommates, etc. to whom you can’t come out, the ones who are homophobic, well, they’re stuck in the old intolerant society anyway. It’s not like they’re going to start saying ‘How’s your spouse?’ even if everyone else does.

People are getting more tolerant. Don’t be petty and annoying and insist they get every detail right; that’s an easy way to get people to dislike you. Move on. It’s not worth the one less year of black hair.



Read other answers by Cedric Liang on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2jSL2NA

Do you sleep with your bedroom door open or closed? Why?

Always, ALWAYS with the door closed.

If you leave the door open then you're practically begging the ghosts, vampires, bloody Mary's, monsters and the boogyman to waltz on through.

Extra tips:

  • Nothing can touch you if all your limbs are under the blanket. Only your head should be exposed.
  • As long as you don't dangle your arms and legs over the sides of your bed, you won't be dragged under by the Ankle-grabber
  • Make sure to cover your mirrors. As soon as the lights go out, all manner of ghouls pour straight out of it.
  • Nothing can come out of the dark corners if you don't look at them
  • Close the wardrobe door. This one is very duh. Once the wardrobe door is shut, a magical seal prevents anything from emerging.
  • If you need the bathroom in the middle of the night, you'll have to turn on every light in the house. This is just standard practice.

Good luck, everybody.

The night is dark and full of terrors.



Read other related questions on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2koivjP

Starbucks faces backlash in response to refugee hiring plan

Starbucks this week is facing boycott calls after CEO Howard Schultz said the organization would work to hire 10,00 refugees around the world.

The announcement came in the wake of President Trump’s executive order that denies entry into the U.S. to refugees and citizens of seven Muslim countries.

Schultz wasn’t alone in his opposition to Trump’s immigration ban. He and several tech industry leaders sought to reassure their employees that they do not support the ban and—as is the case with fellow Seattle companies Microsoft and Amazon—would actively fight it.

"We are living in an unprecedented time, one in which we are witness to the conscience of our country, and the promise of the American Dream, being called into question," Schultz wrote in a letter to Starbucks employees.

While Schultz was clear that his plan was to hire refugees around the world, many interpreted his remarks to be anti-American and urged him instead—in that unique way that social media users love—to hire Americans, particularly American veterans.

It should be noted that Starbucks has had a program in place since 2014 that focuses on hiring veterans and their families. The program has helped 8,000 veterans and military spouses gain employment in that time.

On the other side of the discourse, many Starbucks devotees are excited by the prospect of shorter lines:

Still others saw Schultz’ commitment as a reason to patronize the organization’s nearly 25,000 coffee shops.

Starbucks has weathered boycotts in the past, but this is the first since Trump took office.

(Image via)

from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2kRApYM

Delta computer outage stirs outrage

Details are continuing to emerge in the wake of another airline computer outage.

Delta flights on Sunday were delayed and cancelled after the airline suffered a “systems outage” that lingered into Monday. In total, the outage caused 170 cancellations Sunday and 110 on Monday, plus dozens of delays.

“I want to apologize to all of our customers who have been impacted by the frustrating situation,” Delta CEO Ed Bastian said. “This type of disruption is not acceptable to the Delta family, which prides itself on reliability and customer service.”

The organization also apologized on Twitter and included a link to updates:

This is Delta’s second such outage in the last six months. Last week, United faced a similar problem that grounded its flights for three hours.

Angry travelers took to social media to vent their frustrations:

Several major metropolitan airports also saw massive protests while the Delta delay was happening. President Trump even used Delta’s outage to deflect criticism surrounding his highly divisive immigration ban:



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2kdHrrR

Is Vader a coward because he is hiding behind armor?

Oh c’mon! Its like saying Stephen Hawking is a coward for using a chair and computer to move and communicate!

I mean come on. If you had most of your skin and all your major appendages burned off, your lungs seared and barely able to breathe, and you basically near death, you’d want to use that damn suit, wouldn’t you?

That suit isn’t just armor, its his life support. Without it, he dies.



Read other answers by Alan Shepherd on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2jzKVD7

What are some of the most mind-blowing facts?



More than 50% of the zippers in the world are manufactured by one company called YKK. Rest of them are made by other companies like Prym, Coats and over 1000 Chinese manufacturers.

Ever wondered what those letters YKK on your zipper mean? They stand for the name of the company, Yoshida Kōgyō Kabushiki gaisha. Tadao Yoshida founded this company in 1934. As of today they have manufacturing facilities in 72 countries around the world.

Source -

YKK Group



Read other answers by Aditya Gund on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/1SWtj4d

Fake news and the ugly rise of sponsored content

Corporate communicators are to blame for the fake news epidemic.

That’s surprising, perhaps, coming from a communications pro. Yet I wonder whether “communications pro” will be a job title if we continue down the path we started nearly 100 years ago.

Vox reported that the top 20 fake news stories outperformed real news at the end of the 2016 campaign, based on Facebook engagements from August to Election Day. We wondered whether Tim Kaine was in an open marriage (he wasn't), or whether Pope Francis had endorsed Donald Trump (he didn’t).

I won’t argue about politics and confirmation bias. I will assert that the corporate communications function (including marketing communications) paved the way for the adoption and proliferation of fake news.

Growing up, my favorite books were “Amelia Bedelia” by Peggy Parish (you don’t pitch a tent by throwing it, silly Amelia!) and “If You Give a Mouse a Cookie” by Laura Numeroff. The latter taught me the risk of appeasement and the dreaded slippery slope—such as when you agree to let your sister-in-law spend the night and suddenly her cell phone bill is re-routed to your apartment.

Money talks

As with all problems, follow the money. Fake news wasn’t always fake, but it looked like news. In the early 20th century, companies began buying space in the paper to place “advertorials,” a portmanteau of advertising and editorial. These placements are ads disguised as editorial content. (See a few examples here.)

Companies got cookie after cookie, so to speak, in the years following: sponsored radio content, sponsored TV programs and infomercials, ushering in the great age of BuzzFeed and other sponsored content hubs.BuzzFeed isn’t alone; Forbes has BrandVoice, and even The New York Times partakes.

You can’t fault publishers for taking the easy route and selling their platforms—or can you?

Companies are benefiting from sponsored content. Research published by DigitalRelevance revealed that in 2015, “25% more consumers looked at sponsored articles than display ad units and native ads have been found to produce 18% higher lift in purchase intent and 9% higher lift for brand affinity than banner ads.”

I am not accusing corporate communicators of writing fake news articles about the pope, but I am accusing them of softening up the public to the idea of non-news owning the news. Perhaps it is confirmation bias at play: We click and share what we want to believe.

Where, though, did our critical thinking skills go? A survey by Contently found that most people don’t distinguish between sponsored content and editorial; good luck deciphering fake news from real news. It becomes even more difficult when real news outlets realizs they inherently compete with sources of fake news (and sponsored content) and must sensationalize beyond acceptable limits.

The legacy of advertorials

Fake news is the ugly evolutional cousin to the advertorials of old. Companies have no incentive to abandon sponsored content, which would cultivate informed, critical-thinking consumers. The slippery slope is now a cliff.

We are hurtling toward a reality in which the top story in your VR glasses will either be “Marketers Say Soda May Reverse Cavities,” by Pep C. Cola, or “Liberals Scientifically Lack Spines” by author unknown. A battle for the human mind, waged by corporation against absurdity. No matter who wins, we lose.

[RELATED: Attend our Exceptional Writer and Editor virtual summit! ]

There is hope to reverse this trend, though. Corporate communicators have one tool at their disposal—authenticity.

Authenticity can fix this problem because it matters to people: 87 percent of global consumers say it’s important for brands to “act with integrity at all times,” yet only 72 percent call innovation essential. Authentic PR (an oxymoron to some) is also difficult, and it’s much harder than writing a check to Forbes. Not every brand can generate authentic, positive PR, which means it can’t be bought.

Public relations and communications professionals often talk about earning a seat at the table. Well, this is it. This is the table, brought to you by Home Depot.

A threat to public relations

If we can’t get back to our authentic roots and restore boundaries between PR and journalism and fake news, you can forget PR as a practice in a few years. There won’t be any incentive to “earn” media coverage when all coverage is either bought or fake. I wouldn’t doubt that some PR agencies will transform to “creative storytelling” shops for corporate hire.

I commend Facebook for creating a technology solution. Technology features alone cannot solve the problem, though.

Brook Borel of 538 commented in a recent piece about fake news:

We can think before we click: Who is providing this news? Do they have incentives to lie? And if we see our connections spreading lies, how might we confront them?

Communicators for brands and agencies would do well to keep these comments in mind. As content creators, we have a role in strengthening the critical thinking muscles of the American people. If we can muster the courage to stand against the rampant proliferation of sponsored content, and return to truly earned media, we can make headway against fake news.

I’m interested in what my fellow communicators think about the fake news epidemic and, more important, our role in the solution. Please offer your thoughts in the comments section.



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2kOnyKZ

Visiting and Travel: What's the cheapest place I could live in the world for a year?

In Yogyakarta, Indonesia, you can live happily only for $1 - 2 per day (excluding accomodation).

Currently I stay in Jogja to run a startup company. We rented a 3 bed rooms house (with area around 200m2 ) for Rp 18millions ($1500 annually).

Just outside the house, some food sellers go around the resident area to find people who's starving and looking for food.

Here's what I frequently eat for my lunch. Chicken satay: 15 sticks of it and two rice cakes (lontong) for Rp 5000 (40 cents). Whaaaattt, right? Haha.

True story.


edit: additionally, Yogyakarta is rank #20 in the list 52 Places to Go in 2014 by NYTimes


Read other answers by Anton Rifco Susilo on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2kmM5Gz

Make your organization a writing powerhouse

If you’re a writer, you’ve probably heard of the mythical places where influential writers gather: the Hemingway bars of Paris, the London gin joint where C.S. Lewis and Tolkien met or the murals above Barnes & Noble cafes.

Your workplace could be the next hotbed of writerly talent.

Our newest workshop, Advanced Writing & Editing for the Influential Communicator, is looking for a corporate meeting space for its next venue. An adaptation of one of our most popular workshops, the Advanced Writing and Editing for the Influential Communicator workshop combines instruction in advanced storytelling and writing techniques with winning brand journalism practices.

What you get:

  • A writing workshop at your doorstep.
  • Free training for your team.
  • Exposure to top corporate writers and their best practices.

What you give:

  • 1 ½ days of access to your corporate meeting space (capacity: at least 35 people).

Email Danielle Barrera to learn more about hosting this prestigious workshop for writers.

To host a different event, including content marketing, podcasting, media relations and more, see our hosting site.

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2cJXP26

What are some examples in history of people who maintained dignity when they were in a bind?



Julia Gillard was the first ever female to be elected the Prime Minister of Australia. Almost as soon as she took office she was hated and reviled by sections of the community who couldn't stand her. Rupert Murdoch rallied his news outlets against her and talk radio used to go into meltdown accusing her of all sorts of things.

During her time in office her father died and a shock-jock was caught out telling a gathering of people that he died of shame. Another one felt the need to constantly badger her with a series of questions about her partner's sexuality, claiming he must be gay because he was a hairdresser and implying that she was romantically involved with a practicing homosexual. A menu was presented at a fundraising dinner hosted by her political opponents which featured ""Julia Gillard Kentucky Fried Quail - small breasts, huge thighs and a big red box".

Political cartoonists portrayed her as overweight with a large beaked nose and an enormous posterior. One political cartoonist, who publishes on the internet and markets his own calendars, always depicted her as a naked, overweight bondage queen with sagging breasts, an enormous bum and a permanent strap on dildo.  This is just one example...




Her previous relationships were scrutinised and constant attempts were made to try and prove she was corrupt in her business dealings before her political life. Politically she tried to treat a reasonably centrist approach but was hated by those on the right for her environmental policies but regularly criticised by those on the left for her stance on gay marriage.

Meanwhile her own party attempted to destabilise her leadership at every opportunity and opinion polls were constantly being published talking about her lack of popularity and how other people in her party would have more chance of winning an election. She was constantly looking over her shoulder and dealing with leadership speculation.

Throughout all of this she maintained her dignity and grace at all times. She was put under incredible pressure and never lost it or cracked. She maintained a position of dignity and grace.

I didn't always agree with her political stance but I came to really respect her for her ability to deal with some of the most reprehensible attacks and vitriol slung at her from all sides. She was beset by arseholes on all sides but never became one herself.


Read other answers by David Stewart on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2kNiYg5

7 celebrities who deserve a social media award

The transition from entertainer to celebrity depends largely on someone’s ability to tap into the public’s curiosity.

Thanks to social media, we now have instant access behind the veil to life in the limelight. Certain celebrities have mastered social media and use it to create strong brand identities.

As we celebrate the launch of PR Daily’s 2017 Digital PR & Social Media Awards , we want to honor the personalities whose social media strategy has shocked, inspired envy among and brought laughter to their legions of followers.

1. Kylie Jenner

via GIPHY

The reigning queen of Snapchat has been elusive about the precise number of followers she’s amassed throughout the year. Although those metrics aren’t made public, Snap Inc. has confirmed that she remains the most followed person on the app, a status she’s held since 2015 .

Her followers tune in for sneak peeks at her popular lip-kit launches, the latest luxury cars she’s driving or videos of her greyhound puppies, or just to watch her stare at herself and lip-sync. Despite her need to share every moment, Jenner remains elusive and shares few personal details.

2. The Rock

 

via GIPHY

Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson had a big year on social media. He launched a YouTube channel in July to promote his production company Seven Bucks Digital Studios, which quickly garnered a following of 1.6 million subscribers.

Using a combination of comedy sketch videos, Q&As, celebrity interviews and the help of popular YouTube stars like Lilly Singh, Grace Helbig, Gigi Gorgeous and Roman Atwood, The Rock has created a channel that appeals to the masses.

3. Kim Kardashian West

 

via GIPHY

Kim Kardashian West has redefined celebrity in the digital age. In 2016, her absence from social media was more notable than the content she did post. Following a traumatic armed robbery in a Paris hotel, Kardashian went radio silent on all social media channels.

Her 90 million Instagram followers rejoiced when she returned to social media in early 2017 with a seemingly more subdued, family-oriented image.

4. Kanye West

via GIPHY

Kanye West has always been considered a controversial figure on social media. His career as a hip-hop icon, producer and fashion influencer is often overshadowed by his outlandish rants on Twitter. It doesn’t matter whether his 26.9 million followers find his rants worrisome or hilarious; he always ends up making headlines.

After he joined Instagram in 2016, he gained 2.3 million followers with ease, only to share grainy snapshots of pieces from his fashion collection.

5. Chrissy Teigen

via GIPHY

Sports Illustrated model, cookbook author and host of “Lip Sync Battle,” Chrissy Teigen is anything but shy, and her tweets prove it. She tweets about body positivity, parenting and her love of food, but her most notable online activity is taking down trolls with wit and sass.

Her 3.48 million Twitter followers love to watch her take on everyone from Piers Morgan to your neighbor Debbie . For adorable videos of her daughter, sneak peeks at recipes she’s testing and photos of her dogs, Puddy and Pippa, join her 9.8 million Instagram followers.

6. Shay Mitchell

via GIPHY

“Pretty Little Liars” star Shay Mitchell uses her social media presence to celebrate the luxurious side of Hollywood. Her 15.2 million Instagram followers are privy to her enviable vacation photos of locales such as Tulum, Mexico and Rwanda. While on Snapchat, she shares her point of view from the hair and makeup chair or her strenuous workouts with her personal trainer.

In 2017, she’s already parlayed her passion for social media into a partnership with beauty brand Smashbox and a reality TV show .

7. DJ Khaled

via GIPHY

Hip-hop artist and producer DJ Khaled is known for his inspirational catchphrases and unstoppable ambition. He uses Snapchat to share his message of optimism. Whether he’s out on his jet ski, showering, eating cereal or watering his houseplants, Khaled uses both the mundane and exciting moments of his life to share the major keys to success.

He even shared the birth of his first son live on Snapchat while his latest album, Major Key played in the background, proving that no moment is too personal to be shared with millions.

Which celebrities do you think deserve a social media award? Should your own social media strategy earn you fame and fortune? Enter the 2017 Digital PR & Social Media Awards today!



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2jyqztP

Why don't Democrats wait and see what President Trump can get accomplished instead of trying to destroy him before he even gets started?

Why didn't conservatives wait and see what Obama could get accomplished instead of trying to destroy him before he even got started?

The conduct of both the Republican party and Donald Trump was both despicable and racist. It’s absurdly hypocritical of conservatives to ask for something they were not prepared to give.

Add to that, Obama was a genuinely smart, dignified, ethical, well qualified and sane President. He deserved a chance, and yet the GOP blocked him all the way.

Donald Trump is untalented, undignified, unethical, totally unqualified and probably mentally ill. He’s a thrice-married adulterer, a sexual predator, a racist, a pathological liar and a con-man. He was elected with Russian government help, and he lost the popular vote.

His inauguration speech was despicably divisive and he made no attempt to unite the nation. Three times as many people turned up to oppose him on Sunday than turned up to watch his inauguration,

Trump has done nothing to earn or deserve any sort of chance. I look forward to him being impeached.



Read other answers by Jack Schofield on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2kP6NLS

Larry King's 9 lessons for becoming a master communicator

"You've got to tell the Oprah story," John Dickey, CEO of Ora TV, told Larry King as we all sat together in King's trophy room in Beverly Hills.

King shared that Oprah Winfrey told him that, while on safari in Africa, she asked a local about various celebrities. She wanted to see who they knew, since they didn't recognize her. The local finally stopped her and asked, "Do you know Larry King?"

That is the kind of reach King has achieved in his 60-year communications career.

His story is the American dream: A Jewish kid from Brooklyn dreams of being on the radio, so he starts cleaning floors at a local station. A disc jockey calls in sick one day, and King changes his name and jumps on the air. Since then, King has conducted more than 60,000 interviews, received a Peabody award and multiple Cable ACE awards, and earned numerous Emmy nominations. He's been inducted into the National Radio Hall of Fame and the Broadcasters' Hall of Fame, and he has a star on the Hollywood walk of fame. King has also written for multiple newspapers and magazines, and he is a New York Times bestselling author.

At 83, King is still going strong. He hosts Larry King Now, which airs on Ora TV—a digital network he co-owns with billionaire Carlos Slim. He has become a communications industry icon and is arguably the leading talk-show host of all time, on both television and radio.

Related: Larry King's 8 Ways to Make Your Cash Flow Bulletproof

If you're wondering whether I was intimidated to interview him—the answer is absolutely. As an entrepreneur and writer, I knew he could take me to school on speaking, writing and interviewing. What were his tips, tricks, advice?

Here are nine lessons on mastering communication from King:

1. Just get started.

If you dream of becoming a speaker, author, broadcaster or other brand of professional communicator, King advises to get in as soon as you can. His career got its start because when he had met a CBS staff announcer by chance, he immediately shared his desire to get into radio and asked how he could break in. He was advised to go to Miami, a newer radio market with more opportunities for beginners. Once there, he took a job at a small station serving as an assistant, running errands and cleaning.

The lesson: Take whatever jobs you can get to break into the industry, King says. And once you're in, "Work your ass off. Do whatever they say. Work weekends. Show up early and don't give up."

2. Keep gaining experience.

King said yes to every communications opportunity that came his way, eager for the practice and chance to improve his speaking, writing and interviewing skills. His local success led to his first national gig—the first ever national radio show. Not long after he was invited to join the then young CNN.

[ Announcing the Internal Communications Best Practices Summit: Engage employees and drive business results with strategiccommunications .]
3. Stick with the basics.

King says he believes that one of the reasons he is successful is that he never lost touch with where he came from.

"I've been transmitted differently, but I haven't done anything different," he says. "Who, what, when, where, why. I ask questions." He gave a great example from one of his favorite interviews:

Now Frank Sinatra is sitting there, the number one personality in the world. I'm sitting there. The light goes on. All I said was 'Welcome to the Larry King Show. My guest is Frank Sinatra. Why are you here?' I didn't go through any pretensions or 'my old friend' baloney.

Today, it's common for a communicator to wear an increasing number of hats: a host who is also a producer, a speaker who is also a consultant, a writer who is also a coach and so on. However, King advises to delegate as much as you can. He relies heavily on those around him, from technicians to producers and publicists, so he can perform when the light goes on.

Related: What 60,000 Interviews Taught Larry King

4. Know your role as a communicator.

There is a time to tell your story or opinion, and there is a time to sit back and simply be a conduit. Though King has written books and been a keynote speaker, he spent most of his career listening. He says that he believes listeners love him because of his "street questions" approach and ability to leave himself out of the conversation—something King says modern hosts no longer do.

"It's the role of the interviewer to draw [guests] out," he says. "I was never more important than the guest. I never say 'I' in an interview. I'm there as a conduit."

5. Stay curious.

To be a skilled communicator, you must stay curious, King says. It's also important to stay hungry. Ask questions, read as much as you can and become an observer of people and trends.

"You have to be curious," he says. "I'm the kind of person you don't want to sit next to on the plane. I do it in real life."

6. Be present.

King's advice for communicators is to stay in the moment.

"Tune out yesterday's interview. That's over. Tune out tomorrow's interview, that's still to come," he says. "If I'm doing a strike worker at a plant today and a president tomorrow, I'm not thinking about the president."

He also added that staying in the moment means truly listening. If you're thinking of your response while the other person is talking, you're failing at communication.

7. Trust your instincts.

King's intuition kicked in during his first real celebrity interview in 1958.

"One day the great Bobby Darin walked in ... [and] about a third of the way in, I felt a groove, something clicked there," he says. "Other people started to come in."

King's gut felt the same click 10 minutes into his first broadcast on CNN. He listened to his intuition throughout his career, which led to his pivotal decision to stay at CNN—a risky move since the network was a small startup at the time—even though he could earn more elsewhere.

Related: 16 Inspirational Quotes From Walt Disney

"No matter what industry you're in, if you're happy, don't leave," he says. "Don't do something just for money and trust your instincts."

8. Just be yourself.

Know your strengths. Are you a better writer? Interviewer? Are you better live or taped? King knew early on that he was talented and "at home in a studio." He credits his success to this knowledge, paired with some early advice he received from Arthur Godfrey.

"You can't make the viewer like you, so be yourself." King recalls. "The only secret is there is no secret. Be yourself."

9. Never give up.

King went on to assure aspiring communicators that, even though it's a competitive industry, if they have the skills and the commitment to stick with it for the long haul, they will make it. To succeed, King says, you have to have the "comeuppance," explaining that even now, he's wondering, "what else can I do?"

"You're going to get rejected, you're going to get fired," he says. "Never give up."

The journey, with its highs and lows, has been the reward for King.

"The best part [of my career] was the climb, each little rung," he says. "Better than making it—climbing it. The pursuit, the ups, the downs. That was it."

A version of this article originally appeared on Entrepreneur.com .

Copyright © 2017 Entrepreneur Media, Inc. All rights reserved.





(Image via)

 



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2klZi2q

Even if some people voted illegally, doesn't Trump realize that the number probably pales in comparison to how many citizens were restricted from voting?

No, he doesn't.

Its not just this one issue, it's all of them. Trump does not do “realisation”.

Realisation is born of a mind being opened. We only realise when we acknowledge the truth to be real. We acknowledge we were wrong about our previous assumption.

An honest person struggles to lie to himself as much as to any one else.

But to a life long liar, who wouldn't know the truth if it stood up in his soup, lying to himself is second nature. “Realisation” is not the dawning of a honest truth but rewriting the story to match your interests. Making a lie look real. Photoshopping the facts for others as much as yourself.

Nothing that happens as a direct, or indirect, result of Trumps actions, or rhetoric, will ever trigger anything like a realisation, for him. Or his fans.

They will create an elaborate lie, a series of lies, tailored for the consumption of their fellow fans.

They will never experience any realisation.



Read other related questions on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2jpln0q

Monday, January 30, 2017

3 measurement myths that PR pros should see right through

A great PR campaign would be nothing without a great plan to measure its results.

Vanity metrics and padded numbers, though, do nothing to help you in the long run. Are you falling prey to these common misconceptions about PR measurement?

1. Myth: It’s all about impressions.

Truth: Stakeholders want to see exactly how your programs are helping the bottom line.

2. Myth: Measurement is just about the numbers.

Truth: Numbers might make up your data, but it’s the actionable insights behind them that count.

3. Myth: You’re a PR pro, not a data scientist.

Truth: In today’s business world, you have to be both.

Separate fact from fiction, and learn how to craft a bulletproof plan for measuring your campaigns during the PR Measurement Conference Webcast on Feb. 1–2.

You’ll be prepared to optimize your programs, prove ROI to senior leaders and wow stakeholders with your success!

Register here to save $100



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2kJfrMI

What was the most time consuming thing you've ever done that turned out to be useless?

In 1982, the U.S. mint switched the composition of pennies from copper to copper-plated zinc to cut down on costs. The cost of the copper needed to make a penny was higher than the coin’s face value. It is common for people to buy huge boxes of pennies from banks to search for copper pennies.

Now, the collectors will go through these boxes with machines that can detect whether a penny is copper or not. Some of these machines are very sophisticated and others are not. The ones that are not are these basic, hand-fed machines which are very labor intensive.

They look like this.

People will collect copper pennies because their melt value is more than their face value—the last conversion I remember was that a copper penny was equal to 2.5 cents or a little more than double face value. This conversion is based on the price of copper but the copper value is always greater than the face value.

The catch is that it is illegal to melt coins for their metals, because the mint knows that the metal in the coin is worth more than face value.

However, many people are convinced that we are on the brink of this law changing—I’ve been told this since 2009.

The father of my best friend is one of the people who believed the law was going to change so he started sorting pennies in 2010. It became his go-to hobby and he fills his free time with sorting through thousands of pennies. The last count I received from him was that he had sorted through over 425,000 pennies looking for copper ones.

My best friend and I used to help him feed pennies one by one into his little machine and then would box up the zinc pennies to be sold back to the bank.

This would be a fairly profitable investment—he is buying a currency for 1 cent and is then able to “sell it” for 2.5 cents. That is a crazy ROI.

He has spent weeks of his time doing this—this is what he does when he gets off work or wants to relax.

It doesn't seem like they are ever going to change the rule to allow him to melt the pennies which means that he has spent weeks hand sorting pennies for no reason.

That has to set a record for the most time consuming thing that turned out to be useless.



Read other related questions on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2jNcU5B

A Reply: MLS Cooperation Creates Value for All Brokers, Not Just One

Public MLS StatisticsThe future of MLS’ has been a hot topic recently, and was discussed at Inman Connect.

Michael Wurzer from FlexMLS (a MLS software vendor) wrote a response titled “MLS Cooperation Creates Value for All Brokers, Not Just One” to Rob and I (and others). I’ll repost it here for your reading pleasure, and offer a few thoughts afterward.

I attended the Inman Connect Conference in New York City last week, where there was yet another panel posing the so-tired question, “Is the MLS Doomed?” I’m not going to dive into the panel itself, which did a fine job, but rather I want to comment on two blog posts from Rob Hahn and Drew Meyers over the weekend that followed-up on the panel.

Both blog posts are great examples of what leads so many down the well-worn path of predicting the death of the MLS, namely a fundamental misunderstanding of the value MLS delivers. MLS creates value through cooperation of competing brokers. The mistake so many make in analyzing the future of the MLS is they misunderstand either the source of MLS cooperation or the nature of it.

For example, the analysis in Drew Meyers’ post suggests a few technology tweaks could replace the MLS. However, as I explained in my post MLS Is More Than Technology about ten years ago (yikes, 10 years flies), cooperation is based on trust, not technology. The simple reason Zillow Group (ZG) could not replace the MLS is that, as a competitive advertising entity, they won’t get all the competitors to cooperate.

In fact, ZG’s very public strategy to focus only on Premier Agents makes it very clear that they have no interest in working with all brokers, they understandably just want to work with those willing to pay them the big bucks. Of course, one could argue that, eventually, ZG’s Premier Agents some day will be the only agents left, creating a de facto “MLS,” but that ignores the diminishing returns of an advertising platform like ZG in any given market. Competing brokers automatically will seek out alternative platforms in order to compete in a less bloody ocean and that competition naturally lessens the cooperation. The bottom line is that competitive advertising portals like ZG are not designed to create cooperation, and so they will not replace MLS, regardless of the technology involved.

Let’s move on to Rob Hahn’s post. Rob says, “The core value proposition of the MLS is that it is the lawgiver which regulates the behavior of real estate professionals to each other.” Again, the core value of the MLS is cooperation, not the rules themselves. The rules are the agreement that comes from and creates the cooperation, but that doesn’t mean the value of the MLS is from the rules themselves. I think the failure to make this fundamental distinction results in people thinking of the MLS as a burden instead of a value.

Next, I’ll address the point in the title of this post: “MLS Cooperation Creates Value for All Brokers (and Agents and Consumers), Not Just One.” Distinguishing between the value of cooperation (all brokers) and the needs of one broker (competition) is critical to any analysis regarding the future of the MLS. Typically when folks like Drew and Rob analyze the value proposition of the MLS, they do so from the perspective of a single broker or agent, but that ignores the core value of the MLS, which is the cooperation among the individual brokers and agents.

A simple example might make this point more clear. Many in the industry express concern or confusion about how Upstream is going to the impact MLS organizations, but Upstream, by definition, will not reduce the value of the MLS because it is an individual broker product and not a product that provides aggregated data from all the brokers in the MLS. Undoubtedly, many individual brokers will benefit from Upstream and Upstream will be integrated with the MLS for those individual brokers, but the product is not intended to and cannot replace the MLS itself because it only deals with the data for each individual broker, not the entire MLS. Again, as ZG found out following its blow-up with Listhub, the MLS aggregation is fundamentally different and more valuable than the listings of any one broker. Thus, by serving all brokers through cooperation, the MLS creates value that doesn’t exist anywhere else and is not replaceable by serving anything less than all brokers.

Let me wrap up by calling for an end to all conference panels prognosticating about the death of the MLS. I think we’ve all heard that debate enough and what’s a lot more interesting is what MLSs are doing to improve the incredible value created by cooperation. I’ll write more about that in the coming months, but, for now, let me proclaim once and for all, “The MLS is Dead, Long Live the MLS!”

I don’t disagree with his thought that the value of the MLS is cooperation and trust — not technology.

Playing devil’s advocate…

That said, I’d argue agent/broker cooperation (based on trust) already exists, independent of the technology being used to facilitate that cooperation. It would still exist even were a new technology platform to emerge to facilitate the business currently taking place using the prsent day MLS.

Social networks are a similar dynamic. We all know Facebook is the elephant in the room — yet even they are not invincible (a topic I wrote about in 2012). If a majority of my trusted friends moved from Facebook to social network Y — I’d follow, and Facebook would become useless to me. The fact that I trust those people isn’t dependent on the technology in place.

It seems building a new technology offering to facilitate real estate business for member associations around the country, while allowing those associations to control who does and does not belong to the group, is entirely doable.

Zillow Group could then buy such a offering, or fund its creation.

Keep in mind, Zillow Group has an advantage virtually no one (aside from Realtor.com) has — their product is used by virtually every buyer, seller, and agent in the country. Scale and brand power shouldn’t be overlooked in this discussion.

That’s all for now, though am certainly willing to continue the discussion in the comments.

The post A Reply: MLS Cooperation Creates Value for All Brokers, Not Just One appeared first on GeekEstate Blog.



from GeekEstate Blog http://ift.tt/2jMFiop

If we resurrected Gauss and he attended MIT, would the classes challenge him?

He would blow away his professors worse than Good Will Hunting , but he would do it to every one of them.  As others have pointed out, there are an enormous number of things in mathematics and physics that are named for Gauss.  Even if as resurrected he had no memory of the things he had discovered in his previous life, it is obvious that he would easily understand them.  However, that would only make him a top student at MIT and get him into graduate courses as an undergraduate.

That's where he would really stand out.  Time after time when the professor would challenge the class with an unsolved problem, if Gauss didn't solve it instantly, he would solve it within days or weeks.  He would absolutely thrive in the modern academic world.  He would be able to do much more than he did in his real life.  He would be a tenured full professor within a few years of entering MIT as a freshman.



Read other answers by James Baker on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2kahppm

Frito Lay to launch ‘breathalyzer’ Tositos bags

The Super Bowl often brings with it a spike in drunk driving—but this year, Frito Lay is doing something about it.

The company has teamed up with Uber and Mothers Against Drunk Driving for a marketing stunt to bring awareness to this fact—and perhaps, even combat it.

The stunt? A Tostitos bag that can tell you if you’re too drunk to drive.

Frito Lay is making a limited number of the bags, and they’re not available in retail stores. They’re probably part of on-site bar promotions for the big game.

[RELATED: Earn recognition and accolades for your PR efforts .]

The promotion has sparked skepticism, notably from two Kansas police departments, which received its own PR boost for the interaction:

The high-tech Tositos bag also comes with a $10 credit for Uber and near-field communication chip that will order a ride for you when you tap it with your smartphone.

“Whether watching the big game at a friend’s house or at a local bar, a safe ride home is just a few, easy taps away,” Frito-Lay’s chief marketing officer, Jennifer Saenz, said in a press release.

(Image via)

from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2kNsziO

If I get caught cheating on a technical interview, will I be blacklisted from that company forever?

At my previous job I did a phone screen of a candidate who answered my questions appropriately. I sent him a coding assignment to see his level of skill in PHP at the time, and he sent it back in a few days and it looked great. I called him to come on-site, and when he arrived, I told him that we'd be working on his code submission to add a few features or to fix a few bugs, and he got a scared look on his face and he fumbled around quite a lot trying to track down where some bugs were.

After watching him struggle for several minutes, I asked him if he was the person who wrote the code. He admitted to me that he had a friend write the code. We tried to make progress in adding those features and fixing those bugs, but it was clear that his programming skills and debugging skills were very weak and he was therefore not suitable as a candidate. But first and foremost, he lied to us by submitting code that was not his, and we blacklisted him from ever applying at our company again.

If you cheat, it proves that you're a dishonest person, and very few companies will want to risk hiring such a person.


Read other answers by Ian Douglas on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2jMnBFu

Social media users lash out with #DeleteUber hashtag

The hashtag #DeleteUber was trending through much of the weekend on Facebook and Twitter after many accused the ride-hailing company of profiting in the wake of President Donald Trump’s immigration ban.

The New York Taxi Workers Alliance called for a halt on rides to JFK to protest the fact that citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries were being detained at the airport. During the taxi strike, Uber lifted its surge pricing and continued to drive passengers to the airport.

Roger Stone, an advisor to Trump, praised the company for breaking the strike:

The pro-Trump narrative was compounded by a statement to employees made by the company’s chief executive, Travis Kalanick.

The statement said that the company would “partner with anyone in the world as long they're about making transportation in cities better,” and explicitly encompassed the Trump administration. Kalanick serves as part of a Trump business advisory group, the President's Strategic and Policy Forum.

"We've taken the view that in order to serve cities you need to give their citizens a voice, a seat at the table," Kalanick said after receiving backlash.

[RELATED: Keep your cool in a crisis with these tips.]

In an attempt at damage control, Kalanick sent the following email to the company’s employees on Saturday:

Judging from the harsh tone that several tweets took, it may take more than that to win back customers—especially in New York:

Uber denied that it was trying to break the strike by ending its surge pricing and offering rides to and from JFK:

On Sunday, Kalanick followed up with another Facebook post, in which he vowed to “create a $3 million legal defense fund to help drivers with immigration and translation services.”

In the post, Kalanick said he would “urge the government to reinstate the right of U.S. residents to travel—whatever their country of origin—immediately.”

(Image via)



from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2k9JKfu

OfferPad

Some of you may have heard about an Opendoor competitor that recently raised $260 million in financing (equity + debt).

Offerpad.

offerpad-homepage

They are smaller than Opendoor:

Revenues to date – which come from an average 9% fee that includes 6% that’s equivalent to the typical real estate brokerage commission and a risk-based fee that ranges from 1% to 7% – are in the neighborhood of $20 million.

How many other similar models will emerge in the coming 12-18 months? I’m betting it’ll be more than a few. Keep in mind, these models are really just modern versions of We Buy Ugly Houses. I’d be curious to hear what they view as defensible about their businesses (aka their moat) other than money and brand.

The post OfferPad appeared first on GeekEstate Blog.



from GeekEstate Blog http://ift.tt/2jO73KJ

What are the sneakiest, most under-the-radar methods of cheating on tests?

Introducing the Gameband:

This is a programmable watch/flash drive, for storing your Minecraft worlds on.

You can also type in any phrase you want and it will scroll across the screen.

All you have to do is type in whatever information you need for the test, download it onto the band, and wear it. It looks sort of like a FitBit, so likely no one will think to make you take it off.

Also, see that red button on the side? You can set the message so that it doesn't scroll until you press it more than once. That way, you can demonstrate the watch function to appease anyone who’s suspicious of the device.

Please don’t take this advice.



Read other answers by Kristin Leitner on Quora: Read more answers on Quora.

from Quora http://ift.tt/2kMk482

3 tips for better content marketing goals

As 2017 unfolds, the importance of content marketing is growing.

The challenging aspect of content marketing is that it’s easy to lose track of where you are. There’s usually a lot of time between when you publish content and when you see results, so you can get lost in the middle. The solution is to set better goals.

“Business goals represent an intentional approach to your business. They tell your team and the marketplace that you're not simply going to react to developments, but take an active role in shaping your company's future and the marketplace itself,” says an article on the Gaebler website .

If this is true, then why wouldn’t you have specific content marketing goals as well? Goals provide focus, motivation, confidence and accountability. Stop approaching content marketing in a guerrilla warfare manner; instead, attack it head on with strategic goals.

Here’s how to set goals that produce tangible benefits:

1. Break goals up into milestones. A business owner or manager might say, “We want 250,000 unique monthly visitors on our blog.” That’s great, but how do you get from 250 to 250,000? Break this larger goal up into digestible chunks. Successful investor and financial coach Timothy Sykes believes that’s important, regardless of the goal, but he warns against being too rigid. “Don’t let yourself become frozen by this prospect, because we’re merely laying down a rough sketch of the road ahead,” he tells his students . Along the way, he says, “reevaluate your goals and milestones. You can adjust as needed.”

2. Identify relevant KPIs. Setting goals is only half the battle. You need a plan for accurately measuring the efficacy of these goals; otherwise, you don’t really know what’s happening. This is where key performance indicators (KPIs) come into play. There are dozens of content marketing KPIs you can use; focus on those that are relevant to your specific goals. Tracking irrelevant KPIs can lead you astray.

[RELATED: Attend the PR and Media Relations Summit in NYC and find what it takes to produce better brand journalism . ]

3. Page views and shares aren’t everything. Be wary of making those metrics the primary content marketing goals by which you gauge everything else. They don’t provide much value to your brand (other than exposure). Focus on conversion-oriented goals, such as email opt-ins, clicks from landing pages to product pages, and sales volume from first-time visitors. Use specific and consistent calls to action in all your content marketing efforts. You’re always going to get brand exposure through content, so make sure you’re getting both exposure and tangible conversions.

Anna Johansson is a freelance writer, researcher and business consultant. She is also a columnist for Entrepreneur and The Huffington Post. Follow her on Twitter and LinkedIn .

(Image via)

from PR Daily News Feed http://ift.tt/2kjJqwQ